Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 707

Judge tosses Quarter Pounder suit against McDonald's

Two consumers sought $5 million over lack of price disparity

November 12, 2018

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Photo
The toppings and garnishments on your hamburger don't in any way affect the price you pay for your meal, according to a judge in South Florida.

The Miami Herald reports that U.S. District Judge William Dimitrouleas has tossed out a suit filed by two consumers who claimed McDonald's overcharges consumers who order their Quarter Pounder without cheese since the burger costs the same as one with cheese. The plaintiffs were seeking $5 million in damages.

Dimitrouleas reportedly dismissed the suit "with prejudice," meaning the two plaintiffs cannot file it again.

According to the Herald, the judge ruled the two consumers failed to "state a claim," meaning they didn't explain how McDonald's pricing policy harmed them. The ruling reportedly says a Quarter Pounder with no cheese and cheese are separate and distinct products, both of which are offered for sale and can be purchased separately in McDonalds restaurants.

Suit falls short

Attorneys for the plaintiffs, in a suit filed in May, argued that consumers who want their Quarter Pounder without cheese can get it at a reduced cost if they order using the McDonald's app.

Attorneys for McDonald's said the information contained within the app is not the same as advertising because product availability and prices displayed on the App will change, depending on the consumer's location.

The fast-food chain also argued that cheese is an ingredient in a number in different menu items and is not a separate menu item. The court reportedly agreed.

An opposite ruling could well have unleashed chaos in the restaurant industry. McDonald's competitor Burger King has the slogan "have it your way." When ordering one of Burger King's sandwiches, the consumer can withhold as many toppings as they like but the price of the burger is not affected.

The Herald reports that the judge threw out the suit because it fails under "any common sense analysis." In short, Dimitrouleas said the things that go on a hamburger -- lettuce, tomato, onion -- are ingredients, not separate products. No one, he wrote, would go to a restaurant and be able to order just a piece of cheese or a pickle.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 707

Trending Articles